<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marking Deprecated Classes and Methods in Flex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.herrodius.com/blog/190/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.herrodius.com/blog/190</link>
	<description>Thoughts from a software developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 08:04:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.herrodius.com/blog/190/comment-page-1#comment-14089</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herrodius.com/blog/?p=190#comment-14089</guid>
		<description>I believe there was a time when Deprecated metadata was undocumented, possibly when Flex was still version 2, and possibly even in earlier releases of Flex 3. There was a lot of metadata that was undocumented for a long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe there was a time when Deprecated metadata was undocumented, possibly when Flex was still version 2, and possibly even in earlier releases of Flex 3. There was a lot of metadata that was undocumented for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.herrodius.com/blog/190/comment-page-1#comment-14086</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herrodius.com/blog/?p=190#comment-14086</guid>
		<description>Cool beans! Blogs are nice for some things, but I&#039;ve seen often that things claimed to be &quot;undocumented&quot;, actually ARE documented, just often enough, not where one might expect them to be. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool beans! Blogs are nice for some things, but I&#8217;ve seen often that things claimed to be &#8220;undocumented&#8221;, actually ARE documented, just often enough, not where one might expect them to be. <img src='http://www.herrodius.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christophe</title>
		<link>http://www.herrodius.com/blog/190/comment-page-1#comment-14085</link>
		<dc:creator>Christophe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herrodius.com/blog/?p=190#comment-14085</guid>
		<description>Thanks Bobby. I actually didn&#039;t know it was documented that way. I must have been mislead by the blogpost I found when googling around for the Deprecated metadata. I&#039;ll update my post with the info you provided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bobby. I actually didn&#8217;t know it was documented that way. I must have been mislead by the blogpost I found when googling around for the Deprecated metadata. I&#8217;ll update my post with the info you provided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.herrodius.com/blog/190/comment-page-1#comment-14084</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herrodius.com/blog/?p=190#comment-14084</guid>
		<description>I have to take issue with your statement of &quot;undocumented&quot;.

It&#039;s most certainly documented. It&#039;s documented here: http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/metadata_3.html#172179

I&#039;m not meaning to sound snarky or anything, but I just find it odd that you would make such a claim when the information on this is readily available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to take issue with your statement of &#8220;undocumented&#8221;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s most certainly documented. It&#8217;s documented here: <a href="http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/metadata_3.html#172179" rel="nofollow">http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/metadata_3.html#172179</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not meaning to sound snarky or anything, but I just find it odd that you would make such a claim when the information on this is readily available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
