<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Configuring your ARP application</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.herrodius.com/blog/26/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.herrodius.com/blog/26</link>
	<description>Thoughts from a software developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:13:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arie</title>
		<link>http://www.herrodius.com/blog/26/comment-page-1#comment-3382</link>
		<dc:creator>Arie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herrodius.com/blog/?p=26#comment-3382</guid>
		<description>Christophe,

I wonder if you are still using this approach. IMHO there could be a probleem in what comes first in the application: the onLoad or the onAppSettingsLoad call.
It&#039;s probable safer to fetch the appsettings after we receive the onLoad, so we can be shure of the order of the methodcalls.

Arie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christophe,</p>
<p>I wonder if you are still using this approach. IMHO there could be a probleem in what comes first in the application: the onLoad or the onAppSettingsLoad call.<br />
It&#8217;s probable safer to fetch the appsettings after we receive the onLoad, so we can be shure of the order of the methodcalls.</p>
<p>Arie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aral</title>
		<link>http://www.herrodius.com/blog/26/comment-page-1#comment-817</link>
		<dc:creator>Aral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 21:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herrodius.com/blog/?p=26#comment-817</guid>
		<description>Hi Christophe, 

Nice approach. I also like having a core Application form class -- has a nice parallel with the Flex way of doing things. As we bring this in to the framework for the next release, I would suggest that we use org.osflash.arp.flash.Application and org.osflash.arp.flex.Application -- what do you think? (I added flash and flex as in flex, we will need to extend mx.core.Application whereas in Flash we can extend ArpForm.) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Christophe, </p>
<p>Nice approach. I also like having a core Application form class &#8212; has a nice parallel with the Flex way of doing things. As we bring this in to the framework for the next release, I would suggest that we use org.osflash.arp.flash.Application and org.osflash.arp.flex.Application &#8212; what do you think? (I added flash and flex as in flex, we will need to extend mx.core.Application whereas in Flash we can extend ArpForm.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

